<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Agonist/Antagonist Duel for Enhanced Pharmaceuticals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/</link>
	<description>A blog on Biotech, the Pharmaceutical industry, and Personal Health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:20:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avelient BioPharm Blog &#124; Top 8 BioPharm Stories of 2008</title>
		<link>http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Avelient BioPharm Blog &#124; Top 8 BioPharm Stories of 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>[...] The Agonist/Antagonist Duel for Enhanced Pharmaceuticals - In Scott Alexander&#8217;s first article, he examines Richard G. Lanzara&#8217;s unique approach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Agonist/Antagonist Duel for Enhanced Pharmaceuticals &#8211; In Scott Alexander&#8217;s first article, he examines Richard G. Lanzara&#8217;s unique approach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogbookmark.com</title>
		<link>http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>blogbookmark.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Agonist/Antagonist Duel for Enhanced Pharmaceuticals...&lt;/strong&gt;

One of the persistent challenges of the Pharmaceutical industry has been maintaining the safety and efficacy of drug products in patients over time. Enhanced Pharmaceuticals (EP) has discovered specific ways to modulates the targeted receptor response,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Agonist/Antagonist Duel for Enhanced Pharmaceuticals&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One of the persistent challenges of the Pharmaceutical industry has been maintaining the safety and efficacy of drug products in patients over time. Enhanced Pharmaceuticals (EP) has discovered specific ways to modulates the targeted receptor response,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard G. Lanzara, M.P.H., Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard G. Lanzara, M.P.H., Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avelient.com/BioPharmBlog/2008/07/22/the-agonistantagonist-duel-for-enhanced-pharmaceuticals/#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your thoughtful blog about my recent presentation of Enhanced Pharmaceuticals at the July 2008 NYC Bio Meetup. As you correctly pointed out Enhanced Pharmaceuticals, has discovered that combining an agonist with the proper amount of an antagonist modulates the targeted receptor response and appears to be a quite general phenomenon applicable to many G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs). Although it was previously reported for the opioid and nicotinic receptors, no other research group has characterized and optimized their drug combinations using predictive biophysical methods such as ours. 

There are at least three companies including Enhanced Pharmaceuticals (Inverseon and Pain Therapeutics (PTIE) being the other two) that were formed around similar empirical findings that agonist/antagonist combinations are better than the agonist alone, but general pharmacological science has been rather slow to follow up on these experimental studies. Perhaps because it is an unexpected result that differs from most pharmacological theories and clinical intuition, it hasn’t caught on in the last 16 years since the filing of my first patent on September 30, 1992.  This puzzles me, because these findings represent a paradigm shift in the field toward discovering and making safer and more effective drugs. 

With regard to your comments about the ethical dilemma faced by big pharma selling less pills if they are more effective, I don’t believe that to be the case.
Instead, I see big pharma as looking in all the wrong places to extend their patent franchises while ignoring or remaining unaware of technologies such as ours to improve their drugs.

As you mentioned in your question concerning such combinations, there remains more experimental work to do, but I can tell you that from our initial studies it appears that these combinations work well in animals that desensitize differently and that they appear to work after desensitizing a targeted receptor system such as the Guinea-pig trachea (an accepted experimental system for asthma studies). In our animal studies, there were also less cardiac arrhythmias with our drug combinations than with the agonist (activating) drugs alone. These studies are promising, but need further research. Because our work holds such promise for better asthma, heart failure and Parkinson drugs, we continue to hope that investors will see our potential and rise to the opportunities.

Thank you again for your thoughtful and well written analysis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your thoughtful blog about my recent presentation of Enhanced Pharmaceuticals at the July 2008 NYC Bio Meetup. As you correctly pointed out Enhanced Pharmaceuticals, has discovered that combining an agonist with the proper amount of an antagonist modulates the targeted receptor response and appears to be a quite general phenomenon applicable to many G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs). Although it was previously reported for the opioid and nicotinic receptors, no other research group has characterized and optimized their drug combinations using predictive biophysical methods such as ours. </p>
<p>There are at least three companies including Enhanced Pharmaceuticals (Inverseon and Pain Therapeutics (PTIE) being the other two) that were formed around similar empirical findings that agonist/antagonist combinations are better than the agonist alone, but general pharmacological science has been rather slow to follow up on these experimental studies. Perhaps because it is an unexpected result that differs from most pharmacological theories and clinical intuition, it hasn’t caught on in the last 16 years since the filing of my first patent on September 30, 1992.  This puzzles me, because these findings represent a paradigm shift in the field toward discovering and making safer and more effective drugs. </p>
<p>With regard to your comments about the ethical dilemma faced by big pharma selling less pills if they are more effective, I don’t believe that to be the case.<br />
Instead, I see big pharma as looking in all the wrong places to extend their patent franchises while ignoring or remaining unaware of technologies such as ours to improve their drugs.</p>
<p>As you mentioned in your question concerning such combinations, there remains more experimental work to do, but I can tell you that from our initial studies it appears that these combinations work well in animals that desensitize differently and that they appear to work after desensitizing a targeted receptor system such as the Guinea-pig trachea (an accepted experimental system for asthma studies). In our animal studies, there were also less cardiac arrhythmias with our drug combinations than with the agonist (activating) drugs alone. These studies are promising, but need further research. Because our work holds such promise for better asthma, heart failure and Parkinson drugs, we continue to hope that investors will see our potential and rise to the opportunities.</p>
<p>Thank you again for your thoughtful and well written analysis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
